Emily Appleton vs Krisha Mahendran Head-to-Head Stats, Results & Performance Comparison

When assessing the potential outcome of the upcoming tennis match between Appleton and Mahendran, several statistical categories provide valuable insight. A crucial element of tennis performance is the second serve, and in the past six months, Appleton demonstrated a stronger proficiency in this area, winning 44.58% of points on their second serves. In contrast, Mahendran did not manage to secure any points on their second serve during this period. This metric, which correlates highly with match prediction accuracy, gives Appleton an edge.

Analyzing return game statistics offers further clarity. Appleton has maintained an advantage in returning serves, winning 49.23% of their opponent's second serve points, compared to Mahendran's 0%. Their proficiency extends to first serve returns, with Appleton achieving a 24.98% success rate, whereas Mahendran again scored 0%. These figures play a pivotal role in predicting the favored competitor in their head-to-head matchup.

In high-pressure situations, Apple's capacity to save breakpoints illuminates their resilience, with a 56.9% success rate in recent form, starkly opposed to Mahendran's 0%. This impressive record further amplifies Apple's position as the more reliable player under pressure, critical for in-game betting predictions.

Considering overall performance over the last year, Appleton has participated in 59.32% of matches they played (W/L 35/24), while Mahendran has a slightly higher win rate, securing 66.67% of matches (W/L 4/2). However, when evaluating player levels and match experiences, Appleton predominantly competes in Challengers/ITF tournaments over $10K, winning 60.87% of matches (W/L 28/18). In contrast, Mahendran frequently participates in Futures/Satellites/ITF tournaments $10K, winning 66.67% (W/L 4/2), indicating a variance in competition level which should be factored into predictions.

Surface preferences further differentiate the players. Appleton exhibits their highest win percentage (58%) on Indoor hard courts (W/L 59/43), while struggling more on Grass, winning just 41% (W/L 13/19). Meanwhile, Mahendran performs best on Indoor hard courts with a 75% win rate (W/L 3/1) but has a lower proficiency on Hard surfaces, winning only 25% (W/L 1/3).

Opponent quality also highlights the playing field differences, as Appleton has competed against players with an average rank of 251.76 in the last 12 months, whereas Mahendran faced players averaging a rank of 0. In deciding set situations, Appleton holds a slight advantage, having won 54% of their deciding sets in the past year, compared to Mahendran's 50% in all matches.

Appleton's superior ability to convert break points, at 26.21% compared to Mahendran's 0%, is indicative of their aptitude for capitalizing on crucial opportunities. This is a key statistic for in-game live betting predictions during breakpoint opportunities. Based on past and recent performances, Appleton emerges as the stronger candidate to secure victory in this forthcoming match.